Saturday, April 06, 2013.
On the way to meeting
up with God, I found he spoke to me before I should ever see the face of God,
and in small and quiet ways the Deity asserted Himself and His predisposition
for love as the greatest requirement of our common humanity.
[This being my
treatment of the topic of marriage and its prospects.]
By Richard J. (Rick)
Hilber
A broken heart is a terrible thing to mend, but it is
required to live again, as opposed to merely surviving. We have to heal in the broken places and grow
strong, but the process is fraught with challenges. Prayer and good times are prescribed
antidotes to the poison that pools in our being when we are hurt. This is especially true if the hurt be not
dispersed and watered down to a painful memory with little or no power over us.
Picture one of the most hurtful scenarios of our day and
age, the parent who withholds approval of an adult child who enters into a
marriage union, and even worse interferes in the responsible conduct of his or
her adult child. The parent has a broken
heart over a life choice and only manages to alienate the adult child as a
consequence. No prisoners taken in this
particular encounter, only banishment.
However, there is something worse, and it would be in an
adult child’s failure to be true to himself or herself. The hurt that results is that prisoners are
taken, sometimes spouses, and even more cruelly children who we could have
empowered to live their own lives, make their own choices, and have their own
consequences both good and bad.
We fault former lovers not for our having loved one another,
but for proving all too human and short of our idealization of one another
(which is to err on the side of objectifying the loved one). Marriage is an undertaking that soon takes us
to other quarters than any idealization of the "other" termed
"romantic."
Spouses in love with one another have transcended romantic
love by loving the actual person (or not).
Freedom to go or to stay is an enpowerment that provides second life (and
later lives) to mature spouses. That's
the commitment to relationship those who aspire to marriage want for
themselves.
They gladly trade in the rashness and intensity of romantic
love episodes they may or may not have had for the prospect of actual intimacy
and trust in another adult. The intimacy
and trust are as byproducts of marriage commitment the first children of every
couple (regardless of gender assignments).
Kudos to those with the commitment and passion for marriage
and its rebirth. Your marriage by
definition can not be childless if you actually have a true marriage (and
regardless of state sanctioned marriage provisions of the law, actual child
progeny of the marriage, or child adoption).
Persons who have true marriages or true marriage experience
know of what I speak. Let's not forget
this commonality in the midst of enlarging the sphere of state sanctioned
marriages and rights for all.
It of course makes me more than a little sad, that not all
marriages are respectful and open to growth for both partners. I have known a measure of success, but I also
know the other side of the coin. Divorce
sometimes becomes an altered state of being when there are actual children of
the marriage (but that’s a topic for another day).
As a parent and grandparent, I ask would I fail my progeny (child, step-child, et cetera) for
his or her marrying a person of the same sex?
The same can happen when an
inter-racial marriage is undertaken but that one seems not to have much sway
over me. In Christian charity in answer
to my question, I should say not. I just
hate it that my moral stances are so often at odds with institutions which I
serve and honor with my
allegiance, church and country. Again
as an adult, I find I have no place to hide.
Here, I have tried to state my values as conservatively as
possible, but in a manner which is respectful of persons different yet the same
as myself. This is not about hedonism or
a descent into perdition. Clearly it's
about family values and the efficacy of covenant relationships into which even
atheists can commit. If married, you
become fulfilled and evolved and you reach your potential, who is to say you
are not the best promotion of the married state itself. (Again, the efficacy of the single life is a
topic for another day.)
As a Christian, I too experience sadness that the marriage
covenant perhaps does not become the covenant of the spouses with God as the
third partner, but the substitute of accountability of the spouses to one
another is as good or better. You be the
judge, and I will be the respecter of your freedom to believe in God, or not.
In my conservative spiritually, the assent or yes to God is
obtained by commitment to my fellow human beings and when they fail me or I
fail myself, it only serves to throw me back upon the mercy of God. No easy out.
And definitely no embrace of hedonism. The sacrament I am called to over and over
again is to love God and love my neighbor and to forgive myself and others for
the hurt that results of our common humanity.
No comments:
Post a Comment